US & World Economies US Economy Fiscal Policy FY 2011 U.S. Federal Budget and Spending How the 2011 Budget Almost Caused a U.S. Debt Default By Kimberly Amadeo Kimberly Amadeo Kimberly Amadeo is an expert on U.S. and world economies and investing, with over 20 years of experience in economic analysis and business strategy. She is the President of the economic website World Money Watch. As a writer for The Balance, Kimberly provides insight on the state of the present-day economy, as well as past events that have had a lasting impact. learn about our editorial policies Updated on April 30, 2022 Reviewed by Robert C. Kelly Reviewed by Robert C. Kelly Robert Kelly is managing director of XTS Energy LLC, and has more than three decades of experience as a business executive. He is a professor of economics and has raised more than $4.5 billion in investment capital. learn about our financial review board Fact checked by Vikki Velasquez Fact checked by Vikki Velasquez Vikki Velasquez is a freelance copyeditor and researcher with a degree in Gender Studies. Previously, she conducted in-depth research on social and economic issues such as housing, education, wealth inequality, and the historical legacy of Richmond VA as well as their intersectionality while working for a community leadership nonprofit. Vikki leverages her nonprofit experience to enhance the quality and accuracy of Dotdash's content. learn about our editorial policies U.S. President Barack Obama addresses the media in the White House briefing room on April 5, 2011 in Washington, DC. Earlier in the day President Obama met with Congressional leaders in hopes of coming to a agreement on funding the government to avoid a shut down. Photo: Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images President Barack Obama submitted the fiscal year 2011 budget to Congress in February 2010. If it had followed the normal budget process, the House and Senate would have debated the budget all year, and routinely passed it by the September 30 deadline. The budget process was designed to keep the government running smoothly. But 2010 was a bitterly contested mid-term election. Tea party Republicans adopted the federal budget deficit and debt as their cause. Even though the 2008 recession was still battering the economy, they argued the debt was too high. It was nearing 100 percent of gross domestic product. Democrats and moderate Republicans who faced strong competition from them were afraid they would lose their seats if they approved the budget. To address Republican budget concerns, Obama appointed the Simpson-Bowles Commission in February 2010. Its goal was to lower the annual budget deficit to 3 percent of GDP, balance the budget by 2015, and reduce the long-term Social Security and Medicare deficit. The Commission released its report in December. It recommended measures to cut $4 trillion from the deficit by 2020, reduce the deficit to 2.3 percent of GDP by 2015, and reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio to 60 percent by 2023. But it recommended tax increases that Republicans couldn't support and spending cuts that Democrats couldn't support. Therefore, the Commission's recommendations fizzled. Meanwhile, instead of passing the budget by its October 1 deadline, Congress passed a Continuing Resolution. It funded the government at current levels until April 2011. Voters expressed their dissatisfaction with the economy by electing a Republican majority in the House of Representatives. Republicans gained 60 House seats, with Tea Party candidates accounting for 28 of them. This was despite 2.56 percent economic growth and a reduction in unemployment from its height of 10.2 percent in October 2009. The budget debate raged on. A series of stop-gap funding bills in March and April 2011 were approved to keep government services going. As part of the March budget debate, the Republican members of Congress proposed $61 billion in budget cuts. These cuts were from the Discretionary budget. They included reducing funds for child nutrition, programs to help pay for college tuition, and funding to improve food safety. Research from the Economic Policy Institute said the cuts would have cost 700,000 jobs. Finally, on April 14, 2011, Congress approved a budget with $38 billion in cuts. There was a $20 billion cut from discretionary programs, targeting health, labor, and education. The remaining $17.8 billion was cut from Mandatory programs. However, a study by the Congressional Budget Office found that actual spending would only be reduced by $352 million. That's because of Defense Department increases. Many of the proposed cuts were in programs that probably wouldn't have used all their budgets, anyway. Revenue For FY 2011, the federal government received $2.303 trillion in income. That's lower than its budget of $2.6 trillion in revenue. Income taxes contributed $1.091 trillion. Payroll taxes contributed $566 billion for Social Security and $188 billion for Medicare. Corporate taxes added $181 billion, estate and gift taxes $7 billion, and customs duties $30 billion. The interest earned on Federal Reserve deposits added another $83 billion. Spending Spending was $3.603 trillion, lower than the budget of $3.8 trillion. Over half went towards mandatory programs. These include Social Security, Medicare, and Military Retirement programs. These expenditures were mandated by law. They cannot be changed without an act from Congress. Mandatory: The government spent $2.073 trillion on mandatory programs. The most were spent on Social Security ($725 billion), followed by Medicare ($480 billion) and Medicaid ($275 billion). Proposals enacted under the Economic Stimulus Act actually added $38 billion to the budget, as banks repaid TARP funds. The remaining $631 billion was spent on all other mandatory programs. These include Food Stamps, Unemployment Compensation, Child Nutrition, and Tax Credits, Supplemental Security for the Disabled and Student Loans. Discretionary: Around 40% of spending, or $1.3 trillion, went toward discretionary programs. The president and Congress negotiate spending levels each year. Half of the discretionary budget, or $838 billion, went toward military spending. The largest non-military departments were: Health and Human Services ($78.5 billion), Education ($68.3 billion), Housing and Urban Development ($37.1 billion), Justice ($26.9 billion) and Agriculture ($21.5 billion). Military spending was $752.29 billion and 4.84% of GDP. Security spending is in layers. First is the Department of Defense base budget, which was $528.2 billion. DoD reduced waste by 17 percent by ending or curbing several programs. These included the C-17 aircraft and Joint Strike Fighter Alternate Engine programs. Benefits for 9 million retired military personnel and veterans with disabilities were expanded. It allowed for improved care for wounded service members, especially those with mental health needs. Traumatic head injuries had become much more widespread, as improved field medical procedures allowed doctors to save many soldiers who had died from head wounds in previous wars. Added to that was $158.8 billion in contingency funds to support initiatives in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and a winding down of the War in Iraq. For more about the total costs of these initiatives, see War on Terror Facts. Other departments that support the military cost $167.4 billion. These included Homeland Security ($41.9 billion), the Department of Veterans Affairs ($56.4 billion), the State Department ($50.1 billion), FBI ($7 billion) and the National Nuclear Security Administration ($10.5 billion). Budget Deficit: The worst effect of the FY 2011 budget was its $1.3 trillion deficit. Deficit spending stimulated the economy, which was still needed in FY 2011. It was critical after a recession. Businesses were still operating below capacity and needed new customers. Deficit spending should focus on stimulating consumer spending and creating jobs. However, deficit spending has been ongoing since 2002. The deficits during and after the recession helped to create an (at that time) $15 trillion debt. As it continues, deficit spending puts downward pressure on the dollar's value. A lower dollar raises the cost of exports. That can increase the likelihood of inflation. As the debt to GDP ratio approached 100 percent, investors became concerned that the U.S. might default. Or, they expected the U.S. to raise taxes in the future to get the revenue needed to pay down its debt. This anticipation of taxes in the future can drag down economic growth today. In addition, interest payments to finance the debt add to each year's deficit. In FY 2011, interest payments were $230 billion. For all budget deficits, see Deficit by President and Deficit by Year. Compare to Other U.S. Federal Budgets Current Federal BudgetFY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016FY 2015FY 2014FY 2013FY 2012FY 2011FY 2010FY 2009FY 2008FY 2007FY 2006 Was this page helpful? Thanks for your feedback! Tell us why! Other Submit Sources The Balance uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy. Congressional Research Service. "The FY2011 Federal Budget." Page 3. Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. USA.gov. "Budget of U.S. Government." Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. The Atlantic. "The Long Story of U.S. Debt, From 1790 to 2011, in 1 Little Chart." Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. Wall Street Journal. "Bowles, Simpson to Head Debt Commission." Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. "The Moment of Truth." Page 12. Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. American Society of Military Comptrollers. "House Approves extending FY2011 Continuing Resolution Until April 8." Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. New York Times. "Republicans Form Caucus for Tea Party in the House." Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. NPR. "Obama, GOP Grapple with Power Shift." Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. "Unemployment in October 2009." Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. MacroTrends. "U.S. GDP Growth Rate 1961-2021." Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. “House Bill Means Fewer Children in Head Start, Less Help for Students to Attend College, Less Job Training, and Less Funding for Clean Water.” Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. Economic Policy Institute. "Republican Proposal to 'Right Our Fiscal Ship' Throws More Workers Overboard." Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. California Healthline. "CBO: U.S. Budget Bill Lowers Spending Far Less Than Projected." Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. U.S. Office of Management and Budget. "FY2013 Budget, Table S-5." Pages 210 -211. Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. U.S. Office of Management and Budget. "FY2013 Budget, Table S-5." Pages 210 -211. Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. Peter G. Peterson Foundation. "Spending." Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. U.S. Office of Management and Budget. "FY2013 Budget, Table S-5." Pages 210 -211. Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. U.S. Office of Management and Budget. "FY2013 Budget, Table S-12." Pages 240-242. Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. MacrosTrends. "U.S. Military Spending/Defense Budget 1960-2021." Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. U.S. Office of Management and Budget. "Budget of U.S. Government, Fiscal Year 2011." Page 55. Accessed Feb. 18, 2021. The Wall Street Journal. "Total Global Losses From Financial Crisis: $15 Trillion." Accessed Feb. 18, 2021.