US & World Economies US Economy Washington Mutual and How It Went Bankrupt The Story Behind the Largest Bank Failure in History By Kimberly Amadeo Kimberly Amadeo Kimberly Amadeo is an expert on U.S. and world economies and investing, with over 20 years of experience in economic analysis and business strategy. She is the President of the economic website World Money Watch. As a writer for The Balance, Kimberly provides insight on the state of the present-day economy, as well as past events that have had a lasting impact. learn about our editorial policies Updated on October 12, 2021 Reviewed by Thomas J. Catalano Reviewed by Thomas J. Catalano Thomas J Catalano is a CFP and Registered Investment Adviser with the state of South Carolina, where he launched his own financial advisory firm in 2018. Thomas' experience gives him expertise in a variety of areas including investments, retirement, insurance, and financial planning. learn about our financial review board Fact checked by Julian Binder Fact checked by Julian Binder Julian Binder is a fact checker, researcher, and historian. They were the recipient of the North American Studies Book Prize (2016, 2017), and they have previous experience as an economics research assistant. They have also worked as a writer and editor for various companies, and have published cultural studies work in an academic journal. As a fact checker for The Balance, Julian is able to utilize their experience as an editor and economics research assistant. Their role as fact checker is to review articles for accuracy, update data as needed, and verify all facts by citing trusted sources. learn about our editorial policies Share Tweet Pin Email In This Article View All In This Article Why WaMu Failed Who Took Over Washington Mutual Who Suffered the Losses Photo: Robert Giroux/Getty Images Washington Mutual was a conservative savings and loan bank. In 2008, it became the largest failed bank in U.S. history. By the end of 2007, WaMu had more than 43,000 employees, 2,200 branch offices in 15 states, and $188.3 billion in deposits. Its biggest customers were individuals and small businesses. Nearly 60% of its business came from retail banking and 21 percent came from credit cards. Only 14% were from home loans, but this was enough to destroy the rest of its business. By the end of 2008, it was bankrupt. Why WaMu Failed Washington Mutual failed for five reasons. First, it did a lot of business in California. The housing market there did worse than in other parts of the country. In 2006, home values across the country started falling. That's after reaching a peak of almost 14% year-over-year growth in 2004. By December 2007, the national average home value was down 6.5% from its 2006 high. Housing prices hadn't fallen in decades. Nationally, there was about 10 months' worth of housing inventory. In California, there was over 15 months’ worth of unsold inventory. Normally, the state had around six months’ worth of inventory. By the end of 2007, many loans were more than 100% of the home's value. WaMu had tried to be conservative. It only wrote 20% of its mortgages at greater than 80%loan-to-value ratio. But when housing prices fell, it no longer mattered. The second reason for WaMu's failure was that it expanded its branches too quickly. As a result, it was in poor locations in too many markets. As a result, it made too many subprime mortgages to unqualified buyers. The third was the August 2007 collapse of the secondary market for mortgage-backed securities. Like many other banks, WaMu could not resell these mortgages. Falling home prices meant they were more than the houses were worth. The bank couldn't raise cash. In the fourth quarter of 2007, it wrote down $1.6 billion in defaulted mortgages. Bank regulation forced it to set aside cash to provide for future losses. As a result, WaMu reported a $1.9 billion net loss for the quarter. Its net loss for the year was $67 million. That's a far cry from its 2006 profit of $3.6 billion. A fourth was the Sept. 15, 2008, Lehman Brothers bankruptcy. WaMu depositors panicked upon hearing this. They withdrew $16.7 billion out of their savings and checking accounts over the next 10 days. It was over 11 percent of WaMu's total deposits. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation said the bank had insufficient funds to conduct day-to-day business. The government started looking for buyers. WaMu’s bankruptcy can be better analyzed in the context of the 2008 financial crisis timeline. The fifth was WaMu's moderate size. It wasn't big enough to be too big to fail. As a result, the U.S. Treasury or the Federal Reserve wouldn't bail it out like they did Bear Stearns or American International Group. Who Took Over Washington Mutual On Sept. 25, 2008, the FDIC took over the bank and sold it to JPMorgan Chase for $1.9 billion. The next day, Washington Mutual Inc., the bank's holding company, declared bankruptcy. It was the second-largest bankruptcy in history, after Lehman Brothers. On the surface, it seems that JPMorgan Chase got a good deal. It only paid $1.9 billion for about $300 billion in assets. But Chase had to write down $31 billion in bad loans. It also needed to raise $8 billion in new capital to keep the bank going. No other bank bid on WaMu. Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and even Banco Santander South America passed on it. But Chase wanted WaMu's network of 2,239 branches and a strong deposit base. The acquisition gave it a presence in California and Florida. It had even offered to buy the bank in March 2008. Instead, WaMu selected a $7 billion investment by the private equity firm, Texas Pacific Group. Who Suffered the Losses Bondholders, shareholders, and bank investors paid the most significant losses. Bondholders lost roughly $30 billion in their investments in WaMu. Most shareholders lost all but 5 cents per share. Others lost everything. For example, TPG Capital lost its entire $1.35 billion investment. The WaMu holding company sued JPMorgan Chase for access to $4 billion in deposits. Deutsche Bank sued WaMu for $10 billion in claims for defunct mortgage securities. It said that WaMu knew they were fraudulent and should buy them back. It was unclear whether the FDIC or JPMorgan Chase were liable for any of these claims. Was this page helpful? Thanks for your feedback! Tell us why! Other Submit Sources The Balance uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy. Office of the Comptroller of Currency. "Washington Mutual Acquired by JPMorgan Chase." University of Washington. "Annual Report / Washington Mutual 2007," Page 9. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. "S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index." Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. "Monthly Supply of Houses in the United States (MSACSR)." California Association of Relators. "Unsold Inventory Index of Existing Detached Homes Historical Data." University of Washington. "Annual Report / Washington Mutual 2007," Page 2. Washington Mutual. "Press Release." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Form 10-K," Page 19. Office of Thrift Supervision. "OTS Fact Sheet on Washington Mutual Bank," Page 1. Office of Thrift Supervision. "Receivership of a Federal Savings Association," Pages 1-3. JP Morgan Chase & Co. "JPMorgan Chase Acquires the Deposits, Assets and Certain Liabilities of Washington Mutual's Banking Operations." Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. "Second Amended and Restated Settlement Agreement." Statista. "Largest Bankruptcies in the United States as of June 2019, by Assets at Time of Bankruptcy." The New York Times. "TPG Leads $7 Billion WaMu Investment."