US & World Economies World Economy Trade Policy What Are Bilateral Trade Agreements? Pros and Cons of Bilateral Trade Agreements By Kimberly Amadeo Kimberly Amadeo Kimberly Amadeo is an expert on U.S. and world economies and investing, with over 20 years of experience in economic analysis and business strategy. She is the President of the economic website World Money Watch. As a writer for The Balance, Kimberly provides insight on the state of the present-day economy, as well as past events that have had a lasting impact. learn about our editorial policies Updated on April 6, 2022 Reviewed by Erika Rasure Reviewed by Erika Rasure Erika Rasure, is the Founder of Crypto Goddess, the first learning community curated for women to learn how to invest their money—and themselves—in crypto, blockchain, and the future of finance and digital assets. She is a financial therapist and is globally-recognized as a leading personal finance and cryptocurrency subject matter expert and educator. learn about our financial review board Share Tweet Pin Email In This Article View All In This Article Advantages Disadvantages Examples Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Bilateral trade agreements lower your grocery prices. Photo: Photo by Tassii/Getty Images A bilateral trade agreement confers favored trading status between two nations. By giving them access to each other's markets, it increases trade and economic growth. The terms of the agreement standardize business operations and level the playing field. Each agreement covers five areas. First, it eliminates tariffs and other trade taxes. This gives companies within both countries a price advantage. It works best when each country specializes in different industries. Second, countries agree not to dump products at a cheap cost. Their companies might do that to gain unfair market share. They drop prices below what something would sell for at home or even its cost to produce. They raise prices once they've destroyed competitors. Third, the governments refrain from using unfair subsidies. Many countries subsidize strategic industries, such as energy and agriculture. This lowers the costs for those producers. It gives them an unfair advantage when exporting to another nation. Fourth, the agreement standardizes regulations, labor standards, and environmental protections. Fewer regulations act like a subsidy. It gives the country's exporters a competitive advantage over its foreign competitors. Fifth, they agree to not steal the other's innovative products. Advantages Bilateral agreements increase trade between the two countries. They open markets to successful industries. As companies benefit, they add jobs. The country's consumers also benefit from lower costs. They can get exotic fruits and vegetables that can become too expensive without the agreement. They are easier to negotiate than multilateral trade agreements, since they only involve two countries. This means they can go into effect faster, reaping trade benefits more quickly. If negotiations for a multilateral trade agreement fail, many of the nations will negotiate a series of bilateral agreements instead. Disadvantages Any trade agreement will cause less-successful companies to go out of business. They can't compete with a more powerful industry in the foreign country. When protective tariffs are removed, they lose their price advantage. As they go out of business, workers lose jobs. Bilateral agreements can often trigger competing bilateral agreements among other countries. This can whittle away the advantages that the free trade agreement confers between the original two nations. Examples On July 17, 2018, the EU and Japan signed the world's largest bilateral agreement. It reduces or ends tariffs on most of the $152 billion in goods traded. It came into force in 2019 after ratification. The United States has bilateral trade agreements in force with 12 other countries. Here's the list, the year it went into effect, and its impact: Australia (January 1, 2005): This agreement helped boost U.S. goods exports by 80%. Bahrain (January 11, 2006): All tariffs were removed. The United States increased exports in agriculture, financial services, telecommunications, and other services. Chile (January 1, 2004): It eliminated tariffs, provided protection for intellectual property, and required effective labor and environmental enforcement, among other things. Colombia (October 21, 2011): Tariff reductions expanded exports of U.S. goods by at least $1.1 billion. These increased U.S. GDP by $2.5 billion. Israel (1985): Reduced trade barriers and promoted regulatory transparency. Jordan (December 17, 2001): In addition to reducing trade barriers, the agreement specifically removed barriers to U.S. meat and poultry exports. It also allowed increased imports of agricultural products from Jordan. Korea (March 15, 2012): Almost 80% of tariffs have been removed, boosting exports by $10 billion. On March 26, 2018, the Trump administration exempted South Korea from a 25% steel tariff. The U.S. ally is the third-largest foreign supplier of steel. In return, South Korea amended the 2012 agreement. The United States will keep its 25% tariff on pickup trucks for an additional 20 years. Under the original agreement, the tariffs would have expired in 2021. South Korea agreed to double its import quota for U.S. cars. Morocco (January 5, 2006): The goods trade surplus rose up to $1.8 billion in 2011, up from just $79 million in 2005. Oman (January 1, 2009): Part of the George W. Bush administration's effort to open up a larger free-trade area in the Middle East. Panama (October 21, 2011): Trade representatives are negotiating labor and tax policies. The agreement will remove a 7% average tariff, with some tariffs as high as 81% and others as high as 260%. The Panama Canal’s impact on the U.S. economy is tremendous. This strategic waterway keeps the costs of imports down. It also provides better access to markets in China and other Asian countries. Peru (February 1, 2009): The FTA eliminated all tariffs and provided legal protections for investors and intellectual property. It was the first to add protection for labor and the environment. Singapore (January 1, 2004): This deal was signed in 2003 and took effect in 2004. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What is the difference between a bilateral and a multilateral trade agreement? This difference comes down to the number of countries involved. Bilateral agreements involve two countries, while multilateral agreements involve three or more. What is a bilateral trade deficit? A bilateral trade deficit occurs when the value of one country's imports from another country exceeds the value of its exports to that same country. There is significant debate among economists about whether a trade deficit is a cause for concern. Was this page helpful? Thanks for your feedback! Tell us why! Other Submit Sources The Balance uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy. CNN Business. "EU and Japan Sign Trade Deal Covering a Third of the World's Economy." European Commission. "Japan." Office of the United States Trade Representative. "Bahrain Free Trade Agreement." Office of the United States Trade Representative. "Chile Free Trade Agreement." Office of the United States Trade Representative. "Overview of the U.S.-Colombia Trade Agreement." Office of the United States Trade Representative. "Israel Free Trade Agreement." Office of the United States Trade Representative. "Jordan Free Trade Agreement." Office of the United States Trade Representative. "U.S. - Korea Free Trade Agreement." The Wall Street Journal. "Trump Pursues Trade Deals in Asia, Europe Amid Frostiness With China." Office of the United States Trade Representative. "Morocco Free Trade Agreement." Office of the United States Trade Representative. "Oman Free Trade Agreement." Office of the United States Representative. "U.S.- Panama Trade Promotion Agreement." Office of the United States Trade Representative. "Peru Trade Promotion Agreement." Office of the United States Trade Representative. "Singapore FTA." Texas A&M University. "Bilateral and Multilateral Trade Agreements." Council on Foreign Relations. "The U.S. Trade Deficit: How Much Does It Matter?"