Investing What Is a Poison Pill? Poison pills explained By Erin Gobler Erin Gobler Twitter Website Erin Gobler is personal finance coach and a writer with over decade of experience. She specializes in writing about investing, cryptocurrency, stocks, and more. Her work has been published on major financial websites including Bankrate, Fox Business, Credit Karma, The Simple Dollar, and more. learn about our editorial policies Updated on April 21, 2022 Reviewed by Thomas J. Catalano Reviewed by Thomas J. Catalano Thomas J Catalano is a CFP and Registered Investment Adviser with the state of South Carolina, where he launched his own financial advisory firm in 2018. Thomas' experience gives him expertise in a variety of areas including investments, retirement, insurance, and financial planning. learn about our financial review board Fact checked by David Rubin Fact checked by David Rubin Facebook Instagram Twitter David J. Rubin is a fact checker for The Balance with more than 30 years in editing and publishing. The majority of his experience lies within the legal and financial spaces. At legal publisher Matthew Bender & Co./LexisNexis, he was a manager of R&D, programmer analyst, and senior copy editor. learn about our editorial policies Share Tweet Pin Email In This Article View All In This Article Definition of a Poison Pill How It Works Types Alternatives Pros and Cons Importance for Individual Investors Photo: Uwe Krejci / Getty Images A poison pill is a tactic used to prevent hostile takeovers and acquisitions. In most cases, poison pills, when triggered, dilute the value of each share to make it more difficult for a bidder to take control of a company in an acquisition. Poison pills were more common in previous decades, but only a small percentage of companies had them in early 2022. While they can be effective in preventing hostile takeovers, they can also be harmful to investors. Definition of a Poison Pill A poison pill, also known as a shareholders-rights plan, is a defensive strategy that companies use to prevent hostile takeovers and acquisitions. A hostile takeover is when one company acquires another—typically by going directly to the company’s shareholders or fighting to replace management—to get the acquisition approved. The poison pill makes the company less attractive to hostile buyers by increasing the price, and either prevents the takeover or creates economic consequences for the buyer. Note The term poison pill comes from actual, tangible poison pills that members of the military would have on hand during raids or missions. Agents carried pills filled with lethal substances such as cyanide, which they were to take in case of capture. The concept of poison pills for corporations was created in 1982 by Martin Lipton, a prominent corporate lawyer. These types of defensive tactics then gained popularity after a 1985 Delaware Supreme Court ruling, Moran vs. Household International, Inc., which upheld the use of shareholder-rights plans. Poison pills were significantly more popular during the 1980s and 1990s, partially due to the high number of hostile takeovers during those decades. In 1988, for example, there were about 160 unsolicited takeover bids for U.S. companies. Over the decades since then, poison pill provisions became less popular, many of them expiring without being renewed. Active poison pills declined from 2,200 in 2001 to 228 in March 2020. Given the uncertainty created by COVID-19, many companies instated poison pills. From March to July 2020, companies adopted 67 poison pills, both new or extending existing ones. By 2022 most of those had expired and adoptions returned to their pre-pandemic levels. Alternate name: Shareholders-rights plan How a Poison Pill Works A hostile takeover takes place when one company acquires another without approval from the target company’s management or board of directors. Instead, the acquiring company goes directly to the shareholders to either purchase their shares or convince them to support the sale by voting for board members who will approve the deal. The goal of a poison pill is to prevent these hostile takeovers or create severe financial consequences in case one takes place. A poison pill is “triggered” when an acquiring organization obtains (or in some cases, announces its intention to obtain) a certain percentage of a company’s shares. Traditionally, poison pills are triggered when a hostile buyer obtains typically between 10% and 20% of shares. There are several different types of poison pills. One type of poison pill gives all shareholders except for the hostile bidder the right to purchase additional shares at a discounted rate. This move dilutes the hostile bidder’s shares, making a hostile takeover more expensive and less attractive. Imagine that a publicly traded company has 100 outstanding shares, which currently trade for $10 per share. A hostile bidder has begun buying up as many shares as possible, offering current shareholders a premium of $15 per share. Once the hostile bidder obtains a certain number of shares—let’s say 30, for the purposes of this example—the poison pill is triggered. The company allows all shareholders, except for the hostile bidder, to purchase additional shares at a discounted rate. Shareholders can buy these shares at a discount rate of $7. Because of the new shares, the hostile bidder now owns significantly less than 30% of the company’s shares. Through the poison pill, it becomes more difficult and expensive for them to successfully complete their hostile takeover. Types of Poison Pills There are two primary types of poison pills that companies may adopt to prevent a hostile takeover. Flip-In Poison Pill: Triggers after a hostile bidder acquires a certain percentage of shares and gives all shareholders, except for the hostile bidder, the right to purchase additional shares at a discount. This dilutes the shares and makes the takeover less attractive.Flip-Over Poison Pill: Triggers after a merger and allows shareholders to purchase shares in the acquiring company at a discounted rate. This discourages hostile bidders who may fear the value of their own companies being affected. Note The two types of poison pill plans can be adopted at the same time, working together to deter potential acquirers. Alternatives to Poison Pills A poison pill is the most common defensive tactic against hostile takeovers, but it’s not the only one companies adopt. There are several other strategies a company might use to prevent a hostile takeover. Pac-man defense: A target company purchases shares in the hostile bidder’s company, attempting their own takeover. This puts the acquiring company in an unfavorable situation and may discourage them from pursuing the hostile takeover to save their own company. This method works best when the companies are of similar size.Golden parachute: This type of contract guarantees benefits for a target company’s executives who are let go as the result of a successful hostile takeover. These contracts can be expensive and, therefore, deter people from hostile takeovers. Crown jewel: A company sells its most profitable assets, making it less attractive to prospective hostile bidders. Unfortunately, it also reduces the company’s value and can cause long-term damage. In some cases, the company may sell its assets to a friendly third party who agrees to sell them back when the hostile bidder gives up. Pros and Cons of Poison Pills Pros Deters a hostile takeover Prevents any shareholder from taking too much control Cons Dilutes the shares of all shareholders Potentially expensive for shareholders Prevents acquisitions that could be positive for shareholders Pros Explained Deters a hostile takeover: The primary goal of a poison pill is to discourage and prevent hostile takeovers, which could be detrimental to both the company and its shareholders.Prevents any shareholder from taking too much control: Poison pills can help to maintain a democracy of sorts in a corporation. This is because they prevent any one shareholder from consolidating too much control. Cons Explained Dilutes the shares of all shareholders: Issuing new shares doesn’t just dilute the shares of the hostile bidder—it also dilutes the shares of existing shareholders.Potentially expensive for shareholders: When a poison pill is triggered, investors must spend money to buy additional shares to maintain their percentage of ownership within the company.Prevents acquisitions that could be positive for shareholders: A company’s executives may be inclined to support a poison pill to help them maintain control. But some hostile takeovers can actually be positive for investors and increase share value. What It Means for Individual Investors Poison pills aren’t nearly as common as they once were. As of January 2022, under 2% of firms in the S&P 1500 and Russell 3000 had a poison pill provision in place. This still does not guarantee a poison pill is actually being used—that is far rarer. However, on the off chance that a company you hold shares in does swallow the poison pill, then you would be faced with the decision to either purchase additional shares in the company or see your stake in the firm diluted. Key Takeaways A poison pill is a defensive tactic that corporations implement to prevent or discourage a hostile takeover.When triggered, a poison pill typically allows all shareholders, except for the hostile bidder, to purchase additional shares in a company at a discounted rate. This dilutes the hostile bidder’s ownership.A less-common type of poison pill is triggered after an acquisition takes place and allows shareholders to purchase shares in the acquiring company at a discounted rate.As of April 12, 2020, only 2% of companies in the S&P 500 had poison pills in place.Poison pills can be effective at preventing hostile takeovers but may be harmful to investors, as they dilute their shares and prevent acquisitions that could actually help investors. Was this page helpful? Thanks for your feedback! Tell us why! Other Submit Sources The Balance uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy. Deal Point Data. "Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) Market Study: 2021 Year-End Update & Review," Page 11. Martin Lipton. "Pills, Polls, and Professors Redux," Page 1037. The University of Chicago Law Review. Justia. "Moran v. Household Intern., Inc." Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance. "The Comeback of Hostile Takeovers." Deal Point Data. "Corporate America’s Medicine Against Coronavirus." National Law Review. "An Update on Poison Pills, NOL Poison Pills and the COVID-19 Pandemic." Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance. "M&A/PE Quarterly." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Chatham Asset Management v. Pope et al.," Page 8. FINRA. "Proxy Fights, Poison Pills and Pushy Suitors: What You Need To Know About Hostile Takeovers." Lipton Archive. "The 1980s Takeover Era and Lipton’s Stockholder Rights Plan." Case Western Reserve Law Review. "Front-End Loaded, Two-Tiered Tender Offers: An Examination of the Counterproductive Effects of a Mighty Offensive Weapon," Pages 400-401, 420. Deal Point Data. "Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) Market Study: 2021 Year-End Update & Review," Page 11.